"Jimm圜rackedCorn" wrote in Peter has helped me as well but when it comes to getting him to admit to Peter has helped me as well but when it comes to getting him to admit to any CCS issues he reminds me a bit of the pet shop proprietor in the old Monty Python skit! :) > On another note, Artisteer works well with VS2008 and I am looking forward
#Artisteer 2.0 software#
> am really not sure Yes Software can keep up with this multi platform > that are now also frustrated with the lack of committment from Yes > Duplo1, I know the frustration and can give you a long list of Forum > just kept responding how good inmotion framework was. > the forum threads of many support requests I had submitted. > Several months ago I got so frustrated with Yes and Peter, I listed in one > decided to discontinue CCS for any new. > documentation and flexibility of the program. I must say that I am very impressed with VS, the user support, > During the past few months, we have tried developing new websites with "FERAD" wrote in To be honest, I cannot keep waiting for Yes Software.
Other tools (which are are actually doing right now). Net, if Yes can not be more "open", then as you, we are forced to look at
#Artisteer 2.0 code#
Weīelieve in RAD & Code Generators and there are some solutions out there for CodeCharge is soĭifferent that they will be better served by publishing a Roadmap. I understand theĬoncept of keeping your competitors in the dark but. Lastly, I believe that the silence from Yes is misguided. Somehow, people treat development tools like Rock Groups with Second, You need to use whatever tool fits your needs, if it is VS, then soīeat it. I haveįound Peter to be responsive and helpful. hence no reason to get frustrated with him. Maybe a CSS to VS forum should be started.įirst, please remember that Peter works for Yes and he must follow theĬompanies rules. On another note, Artisteer works well with VS2008 and I am looking forward to the possibilities with VS2010. I am really not sure Yes Software can keep up with this multi platform product. Peter just kept responding how good inmotion framework was.ĭuplo1, I know the frustration and can give you a long list of Forum members that are now also frustrated with the lack of committment from Yes software. Several months ago I got so frustrated with Yes and Peter, I listed in one of the forum threads of many support requests I had submitted. net applications and use CCS only for maintaining old projects. Just this week our company decided to discontinue CCS for any new. I must say that I am very impressed with VS, the user support, documentation and flexibility of the program.
To be honest, I cannot keep waiting for Yes Software.ĭuring the past few months, we have tried developing new websites with VS2008.
If I look at the posts in the Inmotion Forum it seems you and I are the only ones using Inmotion. What they are not able to explain is why regular ASP.net C# created with Codecharge run fine. And instead of coming up with a solution, they simply claim it is my new server. Well, Ferad, you have no idea how often I have heard this sentence "The problem is assigned to our developers" over the past weeks as Inmotion does not seem to run properly on a 64bit server. And if any changes need to be made they should be done quickly with updates or patches available to all users. If Yes software did buy Artisteer then there should be no excuse for this. You would think that Yes software and Artisteer would test things like this before sending out updates. Hope, they will fix it for the next update." "Yes, this problem is assigned to our developers.
0 kommentar(er)
